🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.